Introduction In 2018, our institution implemented a MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry (MS) method (Mass-Fix) to detect myeloma associated M-proteins in blood. Currently, the lab has performed more than 500K tests by Mass-Fix. While Mass-Fix has been found to be more sensitive and specific than IFE, an ESI-Q-TOF (High Resolution Mass-Fix) method has demonstrated the potential to detect M-proteins at significantly lower levels. Blood minimal residual disease (MRD) detection in lieu of bone marrow (BM) is desirable since blood is easier and less expensive to obtain and analyze. This feature can allow for more frequent MRD monitoring for myeloma patients.

Methods 66 residual blood samples from myeloma patients with varying M-protein varying isotypes were diluted into healthy blood to estimate the limit of detection of HR-Mass-Fix method. 179 Rochester Mayo Clinic patients who had a clinically ordered BM MRD assessment by next generation flow (NGF) cytometry (2 x 10-6), a blood sample available within 7 days of the BM biopsy, and a pre-treatment measured M-protein mass by Mass-Fix were utilized to assess the concordance of the BM and blood MRD status.

Results The average limit of detection (LOD) of the HR-Mass-Fix was found to be significantly lower than Mass-Fix (0.0003 g/dL and 0.01 g/dL, respectively). The treated patient cohort utilized for comparison consisted of 145 myeloma, 21 AL amyloid, 4 LPL lymphoma and 9 other PCDs. Comparing the Mass-Fix and HR-Mass-Fix results, 100% of blood positive MRD results by Mass-Fix were positive by HR-Mass-Fix. HR-Mass-Fix detected residual M-proteins (mass within +/- 1 Da of pre-treatment) in 29 samples (40%) that were negative by Mass-Fix. Thus, HR-Mass-Fix increased the overall blood MRD positivity rate from 57% by Mass-Fix to 78%.

The BM NGF MRD positivity was lower at 54%. The overall agreement of blood and BM by Mass-Fix was 71% (kappa 0.4) which decreased to 0.63 (kappa 0.3) with HR-Mass-Fix. Most of the disagreements were HR-Mass-Fix Blood (+)/BM NGF (-). Blood M-protein MRD appeared to be affected by M-protein half-lives. To determine this, the M-protein isotype distribution of Blood/BM MRD status was compared the M-protein isotype distribution of the overall cohort. The half-lives are as follows: IgG 23 days, IgA 6 days, IgM 5 days and FLC 0.25 days. When both blood and BM were positive, the isotype distribution was not significantly different than the overall cohort. For blood(+)/BM(-) patients, IgG (with the longest half-life) were significantly overrepresented compared to the overall cohort (74% vs 51%) . For blood(-)/BM(+) cases, there were no IgG M-proteins, and the majority were FLC patients. These results suggest that patients with shorter half-life M-proteins (non-IgG) are more likely to be Blood MRD(-) than patients with longer half-life M-proteins. M-protein rate changes over time will likely be needed to resolve the M-protein half- life affect.

Conclusions HR-Mass-Fix can significantly increase the detection of M-proteins in comparison to our current Mass-Fix method. Ig recycling was found to be a likely reason for the disagreement between BM and blood. Therefore, a negative blood MRD status by HR-Mass-Fix is most likely to be the most significant in predicting patient outcomes.

This content is only available as a PDF.
2025
Sign in via your Institution